Monday, November 29, 2010

Meanwhile, In New Jersey

A Muslim girl gets a non-Muslim boy suspended for saying "Taliban." Details from Creeping Sharia, citing this source (dated November 12, 2010), below the fold.

WAYNE — On one side, a Wayne Valley High school student claims that his use of the word “Taliban” was innocent, mentioned in a conversation about a video game, according to his mother.

But to a Muslim student who overheard it at school on Thursday, it was upsetting. And she had perceived that he had looked at her when he said it, Principal Robert Reis said.

Now the boy is facing a one-day suspension on Monday, because, Reis said, he continued to talk about the incident and it got back to the girl and upset her. Reis said she felt the boy was boasting that he’d gotten away with something.

“This has nothing to do with the fact that the boy used a word,” Reis said. “This has everything to do with the boy hurt a girl’s feelings.” And after the boy was told by administrators not to discuss what happened, Reis said, “He went back and hurt her feelings a second time.”

But the boy’s mother, Rosa Giordano, said the incident “is totally being blown out of proportion” and she plans to fight the disciplinary action.


[...]

Giordano claims her son was embarrassed by the incident. She said he told a friend “nothing happened” because he didn’t want to talk about it, not to brag that he got away with anything.
So, do you believe the principal's explanation?

And what about the Muslim girl's perception? Are going to discipline students because they "perceive" something, whether or not an incident, in this case a glance, actually occurred?

I've been trying to find more information about the context of the boy's use of the word "Taliban," but have so far not found more details. Commenters are encouraged to leave any such information.

Labels: , , , ,


Turn the page ....

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch @ 11/29/2010 08:21:00 AM  

|

Thursday, November 04, 2010

CAIR Drops The Mask

Hat tip to Infidel Bloggers Alliance, citing this source:
OKLAHOMA CITY, Okla., Nov. 3, 2010 — On Thursday, November 4, the Oklahoma chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-OK) will hold a news conference with religious and civil rights leaders in the State Capitol Building to announce the filing of a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of an anti-Islam ballot measure (State Question 755) passed in yesterday’s election. The measure amends the state constitution to forbid judges from considering Islamic law or international law when making a ruling.
In the post at Infidel Bloggers Alliance, Pastorius makes this very important point:
Let us be clear, it is not simply that they are religious zealots. Sharia law is the law of the land in Saudi Arabia and many other Muslim countries. When a person, or a group of people advocate for the replacement of our system of law with that of another country, that is called Sedition.
In effect, CAIR is advocating the subversion of our law of the land, the United States Constitution.

Read more about CAIR's real agenda HERE at Anti-CAIR. The information at that site has been available for years, yet our government continues to forge ties with CAIR. Why, why, why?

Labels: , , , , , , ,


Turn the page ....

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch @ 11/04/2010 07:08:00 AM  

|

Sunday, October 17, 2010

Muslim Has Tantrum On Disney World Bus

Creeping Sharia has the story (text and video). Surreal.

[END OF THIS POSTING]

Labels: ,


Turn the page ....

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch @ 10/17/2010 11:43:00 AM  

|

Friday, October 15, 2010

How Dangerous Is Revolution Muslim?

One third of domestic terrorist cases are linked to Revolution Muslim. ONE THIRD!

Please read THIS POST over at Infidel Bloggers Alliance.

Labels: , , ,


Turn the page ....

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch @ 10/15/2010 07:02:00 AM  

|

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Draw-Mohammed-Day Cartoonist Changes Identity

Never mind that Molly Norris had backtracked and disavowed the idea of draw Mohammed day as she never meant to insult Moslems.

Well, Moslems don't accept apologies for insulting their so-called prophet.

From Weasel Zippers, citing the Seattle Times (hat tip to Infidel Bloggers Alliance):

You may have noticed that Molly Norris’ comic is not in the paper this week. That’s because there is no more Molly.

The gifted artist is alive and well, thankfully. But on the insistence of top security specialists at the FBI, she is, as they put it, “going ghost”: moving, changing her name, and essentially wiping away her identity.

She will no longer be publishing cartoons in our paper or in City Arts magazine, where she has been a regular contributor.

She is, in effect, being put into a witness-protection program—except, as she notes, without the government picking up the tab.

It’s all because of the appalling fatwa issued against her this summer, following her infamous “Everybody Draw Mohammed Day” cartoon....
Another cartoonifada!

Once again, the religion of peace proves that it is not peaceful, nor does Islam allow for freedom of expression, particularly if that freedom of expression is perceived as insulting Islam, Mohammed, the Koran, Moslems. Etcetera, etcetera, etcetera, to the point of all things Islamic, including naming a nightclub "La Meca"; read the information about the night club at Tea and Politics.

Remember these words of Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984):
They came first for the Communists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.

Then they came for me
and by that time no one was left to speak up.


Labels: , , , , , , , , ,


Turn the page ....

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch @ 9/16/2010 05:09:00 AM  

|

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Faiz Khan: 9/11 Truther

With thanks to Opus #6, the video is below the fold:




By a man's friends shall you know him.

Labels: , , ,


Turn the page ....

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch @ 9/15/2010 08:25:00 AM  

|

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Mega Mosques In The United States

Please watch the following video (hat tip to Creeping Sharia):



Another video and a link to some reading below the fold.


From the video: "A mosque is a seat of the government." The second colonization of America!

Additional stories about the Islamification via the building of mosques

Labels: , , ,


Turn the page ....

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch @ 8/24/2010 04:00:00 AM  

|

Saturday, August 14, 2010

Your Weekend Graphic And Video


Just how many mosques do Moslems in New York City need, anyway? Information below the fold.

From this source:
“New York City has more than 100 mosques, compared with 10 in 1970, and more than 800,000 of its 8.21 million residents are Muslims, said Philip Banks III,” chief of the NYPD Community Affairs Bureau.

Here are some numbers on the Muslim Community in New York City, taken between 1998 and 1999: 28 mosques in Queens, 27 in Brooklyn, 20 in the Bronx, 17 in Manhattan and eight in Staten Island; however, all participants said they thought they had underestimated the number of mosques, because worshippers often set up small mosques in their apartments that are not visible from the street.
Meanwhile, for the larger Jewish population of New York City
There are actually 77 synagogues, but this has been three centuries in the making!
More statistics at Infidel Bloggers Alliance in this edgy post.

What is a mosque, really? Please watch the following:


Some reading: "Inside the Forbidden Fortress" by Avenging Apostate (2006)

Also see my post of August 13, 2010, for information about the Ground Zero Mosque's imam.

Labels: , , , ,


Turn the page ....

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch @ 8/14/2010 05:00:00 AM  

|

Sunday, July 25, 2010

Shari'a Law In New Jersey

[Note to readers: Please see the post below the one for musical satire with a political twist!]


(Hat tip to Infidel Bloggers Alliance for the above graphic)

The case recently in New Jersey involved a restraining order, and the first court's decision to uphold Islamic law, also called "shari'a law, was struck down in appellate court.

But before rejoicing in justice done, check out the following about the first judge's ruling, a ruling which elevated shari'a law over New Jersey law:
...The court believes that he was operating under his belief that it is, as the husband, his desire to have sex when and whether he wanted to, was something that was consistent with his practices and it was something that was not prohibited.
More about the first judge's ruling below the fold.
After acknowledging that this was a case in which religious custom clashed with the law, and that under the law, plaintiff had a right to refuse defendant's advances, the judge found that defendant did not act with a criminal intent when he repeatedly insisted upon intercourse, despite plaintiff's contrary wishes.

Having found acts of domestic violence consisting of assault and harassment to have occurred, the judge turned to the issue of whether a final restraining order should be entered. He found such an order unnecessary, vacated the temporary restraints previously entered in the matter and dismissed plaintiff's domestic violence action....
Shari'a law does have guidelines about sexual relations between man and wife, never mind all the Islamophilic propaganda to the contrary:
Muhammad said: "If a husband calls his wife to his bed [i.e. to have sexual relation] and she refuses and causes him to sleep in anger, the angels will curse her till morning" (Bukhari 4.54.460).

He also said: "By him in Whose Hand lies my life, a woman can not carry out the right of her Lord, till she carries out the right of her husband. And if he asks her to surrender herself [to him for sexual intercourse] she should not refuse him even if she is on a camel's saddle" (Ibn Majah 1854).
That any court in the United States should even temporarily elevate shari'a law over our rule of civil law should sound an alarm bell!

Additional details about the recent case in New Jersey are HERE. Also see the text of the ruling by the appellate court (pdf). Please read the links as my posting has not begun to cover all the details of this case. It is worth your time to read the links in order to understand the precipice upon which we are standing.

Labels: , , , , , , ,


Turn the page ....

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch @ 7/25/2010 07:25:00 AM  

|

Saturday, April 10, 2010

CAIR Sues DuPage County, Illinois

For not granting a permit to build an Islamic center:
The Council on American and Islamic Relations sued DuPage County Board Chairman Bob Schillerstrom and several other county officials Thursday over the refusal to grant a permit to build an Islamic learning center.

Alleging violations of the First Amendment (free exercise of religion, speech and assembly), the 14th Amendment (equal protection) and the 2000 Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, Chicago-CAIR is charging that the county unfairly discriminated against the proposed Irshad Learning Center, an Islamic institution...
Not a surprise, really, that CAIR is attempting this.

I can't imagine that CAIR can win this one. But in these days of surreal inversionism, who knows?

Labels: , ,


Turn the page ....

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch @ 4/10/2010 02:49:00 PM  

|

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

BHO Invited To Islam

(With a hat tip to Logans Warning)

Important note: Posting the video below is in no way indicative of my support for RevolutionMuslim.com. Duh!

Watch the video, and check out the reading below the fold:




From Logans Warning:
NY Muslims Travel to White House to Invite Obama to Islam

The Islamic hate-mongers of RevolutionMuslim.com, have traveled to the White House, and invited Dictator Obama to Islam. At the 1:25 mark we see RevolutionMuslim spokesman Younus Abdullah Muhammad push away an elderly counter protester. He later states that if Obama were to be judged by international law he would be hanged. The rest of the video is an absolute tirade aimed at Obama.
REVOLUTION MUSLIM is pleased to announce our next effort and we ask all to take time out to participate in this noble cause. We have penned a letter to Mr. Barach Obama, Pharoah of the American Empire calling him to Islam and, or to end the Wars and American aggression across the globe. This is in emulation of our noble and beloved Prophet Muhammad (saws), who sent several letters to the leaders of his time calling them to Islam and warning them in the event they did not accept of impending doom.

We ask all to sign it whether you live in the United States and stay tuned for more information about the endeavor as we use it to spread our platform over the coming months inshallah...
A little something the evening news doesn't cover, huh?

Did you notice the upraised index finger in Revolution Muslim's logo? Remind you of BHO's frequent raising of his index finger, a little habit he has when delivering his speeches? Heh.

Labels: , , , , ,


Turn the page ....

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch @ 3/31/2010 06:57:00 AM  

|

Thursday, February 25, 2010

Arizona: Legal Jihad

In an honor killing case here in America, no less.

From this source, in an article entitled " Muslims Exempt from Death Penalty in U.S.?":
For the first time, the idea that all are not equal before the law, but that some are more equal than others, has been given credence by an American court. Despite the County Attorney’s Office denials, a precedent has been set that Islamic pressure groups are certain to exploit to the hilt.
Read it all.

"Some are more equal than others"? Orwellian, as in Animal Farm. And how did that little utopia turn out?

Of course, the dhimmiwitted will say, "Nothing to see here. Move right along."

Note to readers: another posting today below this one.

Labels: , , , , ,


Turn the page ....

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch @ 2/25/2010 07:55:00 AM  

|

Saturday, December 26, 2009

The Christmas Day Jihadist

(Note to family and friends: The most recent update on Mr. AOW is here, updated December 12. Also see this post).

Infidel Bloggers Alliance has extensive coverage of yesterday's attempted attack. Excerpt, citing Fox News:
U.S. officials say a Northwest Airlines passenger from Nigeria said he was acting on behalf of Al Qaeda when he tried to blow up a flight Friday as it landed in Detroit.

Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., identified the suspect as Abdul Mudallad, a Nigerian. King said the flight began in Nigeria and went through Amsterdam en route to Detroit.

One of the U.S. intelligence officials said the explosive device was a mix of powder and liquid. It failed when the passenger tried to detonate it.

The passenger was being questioned Friday evening.

Both of the officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the investigation was continuing.

The motive of the Christmas Day attack was not immediately clear.

"He appears to have had some kind of incendiary device he tried to ignite," said one of the U.S. officials.

Authorities initially believed the passenger had set off firecrackers that caused some minor injuries....
Read the rest of the posting at Infidel Bloggers Alliance.

The motive for trying to blow up the airliner wasn't clear? Gimme a break! What will it take for the West to understand that the Medinan verses of the Koran are the motive? 9/11 wasn't enough?

Did yesterday's attempt have any connection to what reportedly happened aboard Air Tran flight 297 back in November? See THIS and THIS. You may not have heard about Air Tran flight 297, so check out the story at the two foregoing links.

Also see this posting at THE ASTUTE BLOGGERS. Excerpt:
MIGHT [THE CHRISTMAS DAY JIHADIST] BE CONNECTED TO THE CHUNNEL CLOSING OR TO THE CLOSING OF NYC'S PENN STATION?

WERE THESE CLOSINGS BECAUSE OF SOME SKETCHY INTELLIGENCE ABOUT AN IMPENDING ATTACK ON MASS TRANSIT? AND WAS TODAY'S EVENT THE ACTUAL ATTEMPTED ATTACK?

WE NEED THE MSM TO ASK THE QUESTIONS SO WE GET SOME ANSWERS...

ALSO: HOW WERE THESE CHEMICALS SMUGGLED ON-BOARD?

COULD THESE CHEMICALS HAVE BEEN RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CATASTROPHIC "CRASHES" OF ADAM AIR FLIGHT KI 574 AND/OR AIR FRANCE 447?
Yes, there is some speculation in this post. That's what happens when the lamestream media is derelict in reporting events.

Labels: , ,


Turn the page ....

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch @ 12/26/2009 06:39:00 AM  

|

Saturday, November 28, 2009

The White House Party Crashers (With Addendum)

(Note to family and friends: The most recent update on Mr. AOW is here)


Check out this information (hat tip to Infidel Bloggers Alliance, citing the blog American Power):


...[I]t turns out that Tareq Salahi, the polo-playing intruder, is a Palestinian nationalist with ties to the American Task Force on Palestine (ATFP) , a pro-Palestine lobby demanding the "right of return" for all Palestinian refugees and their descendants. The "right of return" has long been considered the backdoor to Israel's destruction. But not only that: ATFP President Ziad Asali is an America-basher who blamed 9/11 on U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. Asali was a lead U.S. official to PLO terrorist Yassir Arafat's funeral in 2004. And in a position paper in 2007, the ATFP called for a power-sharing agreement at the Palestinian Authority, which would have included the State Department's designated-terrorist group, Hamas.
A little something the lamestream media is avoiding telling about Salahi. Heh.

Anonymous aptly commented to the post at Infidel Bloggers Alliance:
...If they had any relationship of any sort to any type of Christian right organization, it would have been out front and center immediately....
Read the entire post over at Infidel Bloggers Alliance.

Addendum, November 29 @ 7:28 AM): The Salahis and and BHO go way back, to 2005. Excerpt:
...So, while earlier speculation at this blog suggested that the state-dinner security breach posed a terrorist danger to the president, the First Family, and guests (a conclusion later bolstered by expert commentary on the gatecrashers), it's becoming increasingly clear as well that the Salahi affair is resurrecting long-buried questions of Barack Obama's ties to hardline anti-American and anti-Israel organizations, some with real ties to violent extremists in the Middle East....
Read the entire post from American Power HERE.

Labels: , , , , ,


Turn the page ....

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch @ 11/28/2009 07:05:00 AM  

|

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Check Out This PowerPoint Presentation: "Hasan on Islam"

(Two posts today. Please scroll down)

Note to family and friends: Updates on Mr. AOW are now being added to this post.

HERE at the Washington Post, watch one of Hasan's presentations. Subscribe to the WaPo web site if necessary so as to view the presentation.

This is a must-see!

Also, be sure to read the continuation of this post.

A commenter at Jihad Watch stated as follows:
In it, [Hasan] claims that Koranic verses of abrogation allow for offensive jihad, and that fighting to establish an Islamic state is condoned by Allah.
See Slide 35.

Also note Slide 49:
Muslims may be seen as moderate (compromising) but God is not.
Apparently, Hasan gave more than one such presentation.

Labels: , , , , ,


Turn the page ....

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch @ 11/12/2009 08:20:00 AM  

|

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Major Malik Nidal Hasan's Business Card

Note to family and friends: Updates on Mr. AOW are now being added to this post.

From this posting at Jihad Watch:



Hasan showed the card at every opportunity!

SoA stands for Soldier of Allah, SWT a glorification following the use of Allah's name.

At the Jihad Watch posting cited above, Hugh Fitzgerald commented as follows:
Here is a question. Did no one who received this card, who read this card, have any idea what the initials SWT mean? No? Why not?

Is this failure not emblematic of the much larger failure, to know a...thing about Islam, to know the texts on which Nidal Malik Hasan relied, the very texts that support fully his view that Infidels are be decapitated, have boiling oil poured down their throats, and so on? The Qur'anic passages -- the passages that every Muslim who claims to be a Muslim is also telling you he believes to part of a text that is the literal Word of God, and so we are entitled to hold him to that, to regard him as thinking, and perhaps someday acting, on that -- are there for all to see. Robert Spencer posted those relevant texts here the other day, for all to see. He could have posted many more. What is wrong with those who claim to be able to instruct and protect us? They cannot properly protect us, or even themselves, if they are going to continue to be wilfully ignorant. They have no claim to authority. They have no claim on us. They are losing authority. They are no longer to be listened to, if they continue to behave, to talk, to act, in this matter of Islam, like fools.
Meanwhile, the probe searching for Hasan's motives continues with Ahmed Faisal heading the FBI investigation. Faisal has been quoted by MSNBC as follows:
"[W]e are now confident that Hasan's faith played absolutely no role in his state of mind leading up to this tragedy. End of subject."
"End of subject?" That's the FBI's attitude?

Sounds like shari'a to me: Under strict Islamic law, filthy infidels are not allowed to investigate Moslems.

Labels: , , , , , ,


Turn the page ....

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch @ 11/10/2009 06:33:00 AM  

|

Sunday, November 08, 2009

Lt. Col. Ralph Peters On The Fort Hood Jihad

Note to family and friends: Updates on Mr. AOW are now being added to this post, a different thread than previously used.

With thanks to SR, one of my friends in the UK:




Your comments welcome.

Labels: , , ,


Turn the page ....

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch @ 11/08/2009 05:00:00 AM  

|

Friday, November 06, 2009

Major Malik Nidal Hasan On BHO's Transition Team?

Note to family and friends: Updates on Mr. AOW are now being added to this post, a different thread than previously used.

Bob McCarty writes:
Incredibly, it appears that Maj. Malik Nidal Hasan, the alleged shooter in the massacre that resulted in at least 12 dead and 31 wounded at Fort Hood [on November 5], served on the Homeland Security Policy Institute’s presidential transition task force between April 2008 and January 2009 when Barack Obama was inaugurated as the nation’s 44th president.
Read it all.

According to this,
The task force was not officially affiliated with the White House. It was a project of the Homeland Security Policy Institute, an independent thinktank housed at George Washington University, aimed at drafting policy recommendations for the incoming Obama administration.

[...]

Law enforcement officials became aware of Hasan at least six months ago after "internet postings that discussed suicide bombings and other threats," according to AP.
So far, it appears that Hasan was a lone-wolf jihadist. In many respects, the lone jihadist poses a grave danger.

Just imagine if one were to shoot up a crowded shopping mall! Or a school!

Would our leaders then wake up as to the motive?

At the moment, Hasan's murder spree is being classified as one with unknown motive. Pfffft! According to eyewitness accounts, Hasan shouted "Allahu akbar!" when he opened fire.

Of course, shortly after 9/11, we heard a lot about "What is the motive?" Pffffft, again!

Here in Northern Virginia, we're getting a lot of local media coverage on Hasan as he was born and reared here in Northern Virginia. Would not that mean that Hasan should have been a moderate Moslem, a Westernized Muslim? Well, apparently he was not.

Jihad Watch has additional information about Hasan's upbringing as a lifelong Moslem.

Now we have a lot of dead people, their deaths the direct result of Hasan's planned-in-advance actions. Those actions were based on the tenets of Islam.

Continues political correctness will get a lot of Americans killed! Special screening of Moslems in the West is imperative.

Labels: , , ,


Turn the page ....

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch @ 11/06/2009 07:37:00 AM  

|

Monday, October 26, 2009

BHO's Adviser Dalia Mogahed

Note to family and friends: Updates on Mr. AOW are being added to this post, last updated on October 28.

From Reliapundit, the Astute Blogger:



OBAMA ADVISOR DALIA MOGAHED TODAY:



"I don't regret anything I said," she said. "My regret is that I went on the show."



ER, UM . . . WHAT DID SHE SAY?


THIS:



Barack Obama adviser says Sharia Law is misunderstood.

President Barack Obama's adviser on Muslim affairs, Dalia Mogahed, has provoked controversy by appearing on a British television show hosted by a member of an extremist group to talk about Sharia Law.

Miss Mogahed, appointed to the President's Council on Faith-Based and Neighbourhood Partnerships, said the Western view of Sharia was "oversimplified" and the majority of women around the world associate it with "gender justice".
SO... IT WASN'T JUST THAT SHE APPEARED ON A TV SHOW WITH A TERRORIST, IT'S WHAT SHE SAID THAT MAKES HER UNACCEPTABLE AS AN ADVISOR TO THE POTUS.
  • NOW THAT SHE HAS REITERATED THAT SHE BELIEVES WHAT SHE SAID, SHE MUST BE FIRED AT ONCE.
  • THERE'S ONLY ONE REASON OBAMA WOULD KEEP HER: HE AGREES.
  • IF OBAMA REALLY WAS A CRYPTO-MUSLIM WHO HATED AMERICA, WOULD HE BE DOING ANYTHING DIFFERENTLY?
  • NOPE.
More from Reliapundit here.

When the above was posted at Infidel Bloggers Alliance, Avenging Apostate commented as follows:
...[H]er last name is Mogahed. Now, I am not sure but because of that name, I am guessing she's Egyptian (or of Egyptian origin). In Egyptian dialect of Arabic, they pronounce the "J" sound as "G" (as in goat). So the actual pronunciation of her last name, if I am correct about her descent, is Mojahed (or Mujahid) and that literally means "one who carries out Jihad"...
What's in a name?

Perhaps everything — when one espouses ideas living up to that name. After all, jihad and shari'a are inextricably tied.

Labels: , , , , ,


Turn the page ....

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch @ 10/26/2009 05:39:00 AM  

|

Friday, October 09, 2009

D.C. Jihadist Or Merely A Lunatic?

Due to Mr. AOW's illness, I haven't been keeping up with the news as much as I usually do. I have no idea how much the story below has been covered elsewhere.

From this posting at Jihad Watch:


At Jihad Watch, Robert Spencer makes the following comment:
The fact that mosques were included will no doubt be used to "prove" that Ahamed Ali is just a garden-variety lunatic, and not an Islamic jihadist. And he may indeed be a lunatic and not a jihadist. But with the numerous incidents of violence against mosques in Iraq and elsewhere, perpetrated by Muslims of opposing sects, the fact that his notebook contained diagrams of mosques doesn't indicate anything conclusive.
Question for my readers: How much coverage has the story received?

From what I can glean, a federal investigation is ongoing.

Labels: , , , ,


Turn the page ....

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch @ 10/09/2009 08:14:00 AM  

|